Introduction
The 1982 movie poltergeist used real skeletons as – tymoff, directed by Tobe Hooper and produced by Steven Spielberg, remains a classic in the horror genre, renowned for its chilling storyline and groundbreaking special effects. However, one of the most disturbing aspects of the film doesn’t stem from the supernatural plot but from something far more tangible and real—the use of actual human skeletons during the filming. This revelation has sparked widespread fascination and controversy over the years, giving rise to numerous myths, speculations, and debates about the ethics of such a decision.
This article delves into the factual details surrounding the use of real skeletons in The 1982 movie poltergeist used real skeletons as – tymoff, exploring the reasons behind this choice, the reactions it garnered, and the lasting impact it has had on the legacy of the film.
The Scene in Question: The Swimming Pool Sequence
The most infamous instance where real skeletons were used occurs in the film’s climactic scene. In this sequence, JoBeth Williams’ character, Diane Freeling, falls into a partially constructed swimming pool during a storm, only to find herself surrounded by skeletons that emerge from the muddy water.
Why Real Skeletons Were Used
The 1982 movie poltergeist used real skeletons as – tymoff, the film industry was not as advanced in creating lifelike special effects as it is today. The use of actual skeletons was a practical decision, primarily driven by cost and realism. According to accounts from people involved in the film’s production, including special effects artist Craig Reardon, it was common practice at the time to use real skeletons in movies because they were cheaper and more realistic than plastic ones.
Real skeletons, on the other hand, were readily available from medical supply companies, often sourced from countries like India, where selling human bones was a part of a now largely defunct trade.
The Ethics and Aftermath
This raises serious ethical questions about the treatment of human remains and the responsibility of filmmakers to honor the dignity of the deceased.
Over the years, this controversy has also contributed to the legend of the “Poltergeist curse,” a series of tragic events and deaths that befell several members of the cast and crew following the release of the film.
Reactions from the Cast and Crew
JoBeth Williams, who starred as Diane Freeling, has spoken in interviews about her shock upon learning that the skeletons were real. At the time of filming, she was unaware that she was working with human remains, a fact that only came to light later.
Other members of the crew have similarly reflected on the choice with a mixture of pragmatism and regret. Special effects artist Craig Reardon has defended the decision, pointing out that it was a standard practice in the industry at the time.
The use of real skeletons in Poltergeist has become an indelible part of the film’s history, adding to its mystique and horror. For many fans, this knowledge has deepened the film’s impact, making the terrifying scenes even more disturbing. The decision has also sparked a broader conversation about the ethics of filmmaking, particularly in the horror genre, where realism often collides with morality.
Despite the controversy, Poltergeist remains a landmark film in the horror genre, and its legacy is one of both technical innovation and ethical scrutiny. It serves as a historical marker of how far the industry has come in terms of both technology and ethical considerations.
1. Were real skeletons used in other films during that era?
Yes, the use of real skeletons in movies was not uncommon during the early and mid-20th century.
2. How did the public react to the revelation about the skeletons?
Public reaction to the use of real skeletons in Poltergeist has been mixed. Some fans were horrified by the news, while others accepted it as part of the film’s dark legacy. Over time, this aspect of the film has contributed to its cult status, though it continues to raise ethical questions.
3. What was the source of the skeletons used in Poltergeist?
4. Has Hollywood changed its approach to using human remains in films?
Yes, Hollywood has significantly changed its approach to using human remains in films. Modern films rely on advanced special effects and synthetic materials to create realistic props without the need for actual human remains.
5. Did the use of real skeletons contribute to the “Poltergeist curse”?
The curse remains a topic of speculation and myth rather than fact.
6. Would a film like Poltergeist use real skeletons if made today?
It is highly unlikely that a film made today would use real skeletons, given the advances in special effects technology and the stricter ethical standards in place. Modern filmmakers have access to highly realistic synthetic skeletons and digital effects that eliminate the need for real human remains in film production.
Conclusion
The use of real skeletons in the 1982 movie Poltergeist stands as one of the most unsettling and controversial decisions in film history. While it added a layer of realism to the film, it also sparked a long-running debate about the ethics of such practices in the movie industry. As we reflect on this aspect of Poltergeist, it serves as a reminder of the importance of respecting human dignity, even in the pursuit of cinematic realism. The legacy of Poltergeist is not just one of horror, but also of the lessons learned about the ethical responsibilities of filmmakers
